Évangéliser les Canadiens français: missions et retraites paroissiales au XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ferretti, Lucia et Christine Hudon, « Évangéliser les Canadiens français : missions et retraites paroissiales au xix e siècle », dans Frédéric Laugrand et Gilles Routhier (dir.),Les missions au Québec et du Québec dans le monde (CIEQ, coll.« Les chantiers de l'Atlas historique du Québec » : www.atlas.cieq.ca),2014, 22 p.Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur.L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URL http://www.erudit.org/apropos/utilisation.html Tous droits réservés.Centre interuniversitaire d'études québécoises (CIEQ) Dépôt légal (Québec et Canada), 3 e trimestre 2014.ISBN 978-2-921926-38-6 (PDF) Les chercheurs du CIEQ, issus de neuf universités, se rejoignent pour étudier les changements de la société québécoise, depuis la colonisation française jusqu'à nos jours.Leurs travaux s'inscrivent dans trois grands axes de recherche : les populations et leurs milieux de vie, les institutions et les mouvements sociaux et la culture québécoise: diversité, échanges et transmission.Ils privilégient une approche scientifique pluridisciplinaire originale pour comprendre le changement social et culturel dans ses dimensions spatiotemporelles -www.cieq.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".