MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7065931472

Feature Story: National survey results underscore mental health concerns for public safety personnel

2017· other· en· W7065931472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthPublic healthOccupational safety and healthFeature (linguistics)Suicide preventionPoison control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to a new report, substantial proportions of Canada’s public safety personnel self-report symptoms consistent with one or more mental disorders, proportions that appear much higher than have been found in previous research with the general public. The national study, entitled, “Mental Disorder Symptoms Among Public Safety Personnel in Canada,” focused on the mental health of public safety personnel and was released by a team of researchers with the Canadian Institute for Public Safety Research and Treatment, led by University of Regina psychology professor, Dr. Nick Carleton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0100.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→