MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065942740

Evidence and compassion in Maternity care / C.S.Minnie

2021· other· en· W7065942740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBoloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompassionMaternity careDyadMultidisciplinary approachChildbirthInterpersonal communicationQualitative researchQuality (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maternity care is the care of the mother-baby dyad during pregnancy, childbirth and the first few months thereafter. Various members of the multidisciplinary team can offer maternity care, and the focus of my research is on the role of the midwife, who is the ‘specialist’ in physiological childbirth.
\nA “good midwife” is competent in the cognitive (mind), psychomotor (hands) and affective (heart) domains.
\nMy research focuses on the overlap between evidence-based practice (mind and hands) and compassion (heart) to ensure quality maternity care. Evidence-based practice (using the best available evidence in practice) can be considered as the combination of the mind and the hands.
\nMy interest in evidence-based practice includes systematic (and other research -) review methodology and implementation science (the process of how primary research is synthesised, transferred/ translated) eventually implemented in practice). I collaborated with researchers from Canada and Europe and presented workshops, and published a few book chapters and articles on these aspects.
\nCompanionship during childbirth is both a specific evidence-based practice and a component of compassionate maternity care. A few studies investigated aspects of companionship: how women experience continuous support during childbirth, the challenges of midwives in implementing continuous support and how midwives can facilitate such support even if they cannot offer it themselves. Two PhD students are busy developing a strategy to facilitate the implementation of continuous support during childbirth and a program to promote supportive interpersonal relationships between midwives, women and their companions.
\nMy research on compassionate maternity care addresses the affective domain of a midwife’s work (the heart). Two concepts received a lot of emphases globally in the last ten years, namely ‘Disrespect and Abuse during childbirth’ and ‘Respectful maternity care’. My research focuses on building on what works - an appreciative approach and therefore concentrate more on respectful or compassionate maternity care. Individual studies investigated the characteristics of compassionate maternity care from the perspectives of midwives and new mothers. I am also interested in assessing compassionate maternity care offered in maternity units. A current project in my research program is an integrative literature review to identify instruments that can be used as-is or adapted for the South African context. The next step will be to develop a strategy to promote compassionate maternity care and then implement and evaluate it.
\nMy research program aims to improve the care of mothers and their infants. My research program investigates related aspects, and studies build on each other to ultimately benefit mothers, their infants and society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it