MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065984221

A feasibility study of a soybean peroxidase extraction facility using real options

2008· dissertation· en· W7065984221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCapital Investment and Risk Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioproductsHydrogen peroxideExtraction (chemistry)Horseradish peroxidasePeroxidaseLiberian dollarWastewater
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is an investigation of the financial feasibility of extracting soybean peroxidase (SBP) from soybean hulls. SBP is an enzyme that can be used as a substitute for hydrogen peroxide and horseradish peroxidase in a number of industrial and medical applications such as in pulp and paper bleaching, waste water treatment, soil remediation, on-site waste destruction, bread dough conditioning and as a substitute for horseradish peroxidase in medical diagnostics. While the extraction process is technically feasible, a financial assessment is calculated for a plant beside a soybean crushing facility in Hamilton, Ontario. The net present value for the $66 million dollar investment is $38 million. While the extraction plant is financially feasible, the results are sensitive to two key parameters. One is the cost of the spray dryer to extract the SBP, which represents over 90% of the investment, and the other is price of SBP, for which the break-even level is less than 20% of the assumed base price. Given the uncertainty associated with bioproducts such as SBP, the analysis is extended to incorporate uncertainty and managerial flexibility through a real options approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicCapital Investment and Risk AnalysisFrench-language works237,207