MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7065991841

Fall Vagrancy of the Indigo Bunting in Northern Ontario

2024· article· en· W7065991841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVagrancyBuntingIndigoPeriod (music)Swamp
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a nesting species, the Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) is found throughout southern Ontario, ranging north in northern Ontario to approximately Smooth Rock Falls (Cochrane District), Kenora (Kenora District) and Thunder Bay (Thunder Bay District).Although the Indigo Bunting is a widespread and common nesting species in the south, in northern Ontario it is absent from large areas between the above listed sites (Figure 1), and is very uncommon and local even within much of the specified range.As a fall migrant in southern Ontario, the species is a well-known early migrant, with the majority of birds having departed by late September (see Beardslee and Mitchell 1965:416-417; Sprague and Weir 1984:124).In northern Ontario, most breeding birds probably depart before early September, but actual observations have rarely, if ever, been reported.As a result of numerous fall field trips to northern Ontario by the author and others, a number of Indigo Bunting observations have been obtained that represent birds that were at, or well beyond, the known breeding range of the species, and were observed on dates which are very late for the species.In this paper, these records are presented along with additional records, principally obtained from other observers who live in northern Ontario.Probable origin and a discussion of these records is also given. The RecordsA total of 20 records involving 20 birds have been assembled which pertain to late fall occurrences of Indigo Buntings in northern Ontario (Table 1).Of seven birds that could be aged and/or sexed, four were immatures, two were immature females and one was an adult male.Birds observed in the field were considered immatures if they showed fairly obvious, buffy wingbars and/or diffused streaking below, while the bird identified as an adult male (in winter plumage) lacked wing bars and streaking below, but showed obvious blue tones on the rump and flight feathers.The 20 birds were found on dates ranging from 20 September to 24 November, with 19 of these birds first recorded between 20 September and 1 November.It should be noted that for the three birds that stayed after 1 November, and for the single bird first recorded on 11 November, all were at bird feeders and, as such, had probably been artificially induced to linger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→