Finnmarksloven: the new form of co-governance in Finnmark, Norway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proposal presented by on, "Finnmarksloven": The New Form of Co-governance in Finnmark, Norway. I am a Norwegian citizen, but I have worked with and studied Anthropology and First Nations Studies for the last three years, at undergraduate level, at the University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC). I here present my perspective as a Canadian student on a Norwegian topic. This oral presentation examines the evolution of land ownership and governance in Finnmark, Norway and the parallel policies and events which lead to the implementation of the new Finnmark Act. This act, implemented on 1st of June 2006, transfers 100% of the ownership of Finnmark County over to the people of Finnmark from the State, and gives the Sami Parliament 50% of the decision making power over Finnmark County, the northernmost county in Norway. I present the colonial patterns of deterritorialization of the Sami people from their homeland and culture, the struggle over land and resources, and therefore the conflicting cultural spaces striving to maintain and gain power. Furthermore, how changing power structures have implemented the new law of governance, which creates a hybrid form of territoriality, a new perception of space and consequently, a new form of co-governance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".