"I have the Saskatchewan mentality in me": A history of Saskatchewan Roughrider fandom
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Saskatchewan Roughriders, arguably Canada’s most beloved football team, operate in the second smallest market for a professional sports franchise in North America. The team has recently entered into a phase where they are in the top three most popular sports brand in Canada and the most popular in the Canadian Football League, warranting an examination of the historical trajectory of the fandom. Notably, the team draws provincial wide support that has aided the club when it was on the brink of financial ruin numerous times. Despite one of the worst playoff records in league history, the Roughriders perseverance and endurance has attracted a remarkably devout following. By tracing the roots of the club and its fans, a detailed account of the team’s importance to the community and province is illuminated. The team operates as a microcosm of both the city of Regina and the province of Saskatchewan, and its struggles often parallel the struggles that the province encounters. As a result the Roughriders franchise both reflects and embodies community values of Regina and the broader province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it