MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066114600

Florida Panthers Name Richard Pollock, 08, Pro Scout

2016· article· en· W7066114600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodHyporeflexiaTSG101Articular cartilage damageDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Florida Panthers announced today the hiring of Richard Pollock as a professional scout and Josh Weissbock as a prospect consultant. A native of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Pollock founded the hockey news and analysis website IllegalCurve.com in 2007, one of the first of its kind. His writing has also been featured on ESPN and Hockey Prospectus. Most recently, Pollock has served as the lead analyst on the weekly “IllegalCurve Hockey Show” on Winnipeg’s TSN affiliate, AM 1290, and as a color commentator and analyst during select NHL broadcasts on the same station. Pollock, a lawyer in Winnipeg, is a 2008 graduate of the University of North Dakota School of Law. Since 2011, Weissbock, a native of Vancouver, British Columbia, has been involved in hockey research and writing in the area of prospect analysis. He has consulted for various professional, amateur, and national teams and presented at industry conferences. Weissbock studied Computer Science, Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing at the University of Ottawa, where he earned his master’s in 2014 and was an Academic All-Canadian (Rowing). Weissbock will continue his current professional role working for the Canadian government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4400.155

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Same topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207