Guidance on patient identification and administration of recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Approximately one-third of cases of severe sepsis result in death. Endogenous activated protein C (APC) plays a key role in the regulation of the inflammation, fibrinolysis and coagulation associated with severe sepsis. In a recently published phase III trial, Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS), intravenous administration of recombinant human APC (rhAPC) 24 μg/kg/h for 96 h to patients with severe sepsis resulted in a 6.1% reduction in absolute mortality and a 19.4% reduction in the relative risk of death from any cause within 28 days (number needed to treat = 16). This dose is now being applied in clinical practice. rhAPC is recommended for the treatment of severe sepsis (sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction) occurring as a result of all types of infection (Gram-negative bacterial, Gram-positive bacterial and fungal). A panel of Canadian clinicians experienced in the treatment of severe sepsis and the management of critical care patients has developed this consensus document to assist clinicians in appropriate patient selection and management of potential challenges associated with rhAPC therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".