MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066180094

Individual control over light source spectrum: effects on perception and cognition

2011· article· en· W7066180094 on OpenAlexafffundvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
FundersOffice of Energy EfficiencyNatural Resources CanadaBC Hydro
KeywordsPerceptionLight sourceCognitionControl (management)Energy (signal processing)Artificial lightWindow (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For solid-state lighting to make a major dent in the lighting energy budget will require light sources and luminaires that are more efficacious than the existing technology, and a reason for building owners and tenants to change to an initially expensive, new and unfamiliar technology. New luminaire designs and operation modes using the unique characteristics of SSL will aid this transition. The ability to individually tune the light source colour is one such characteristic. Building on prior research concerning the benefits of individual control over illuminance, this experiment tests the effects of tunable light source colour and initial LED spectrum on office workers? cognitive performance, mood, and satisfaction over the working day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207