Ice tank: conceptualization and preliminary pull point design for the x-direction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An x-pull point is a significant piece of equipment. It provides validation between measured forces and applied forces. The current x-pull point has to be replaced. The effort required preparing and completing the necessary calibration is inefficient. Hence, it is necessary to change the current design and make it less time and labour consuming. The design objective was to make the x-pull point adjustable in both the vertical and lateral direction. Maximum capacity is rated for 275 lbs (125 kg). A conceptual preliminary design of the x-pull point is completed along with failure analysis. Failure breakdown consist of rough hand calculations and finite element analysis. The critical deflection and stress is located in the frame. This is due to the inherit characteristics of the design (long cantilever arm). The deflection at maximum capacity is equal to 0.0685'' (1.7 mm). Even at a load of 500 lbs (227 kg) the maximum deflection is only 0.146" (3.7 mm). The material will not yield at this stress. Design objectives and design criteria have been achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".