HUBUNGAN ANTARA SIKAP KOMPETITIF TERHADAP KUALITAS PERSAHABATAN DIMODERATORI KEMATANGAN EMOSI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adolescence is a stage of development in the age range of 13-16 years which is characterized by starting to be faced with increasingly complex milestones. This causes the quality of friendship. One of the causes of friendship quality in adolescents is related to competition or how individuals describe competitive attitudes. This will have an impact on one of the less than optimal achievement of milestones at this time. One mechanism that can shape positive feelings is emotional maturity. Emotional maturity as a moderator is expected to strengthen the relationship between competitive attitudes and friendship quality. The research method used is quantitative with a moderation research design. This study aims to examine the role of emotional maturity as a moderator variable by involving a total of 150 subjects. The research instruments used were Competitive Attitude Scale (CAS) with a reliability of 0.908, McGill Friendship Questionnaire-Friendship Function (MFQ-FF) with a reliability of 0.899, Emotional Maturity Scale (EMS) with a reliability of 0.918.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".