MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066334785

Impact des différentes modalités de support respiratoire nasal sur les réflexes protecteurs des voies aériennes inférieures chez les agneaux prématurés

2024· dissertation· en· W7066334785 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessNasal cannulaContinuous positive airway pressureRespiratory systemTachypneaAirwayRespiratory physiologyEsophagus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Introduction: Preterm infants have immature vital lower airway protective reflexes. Therefore, oral feeding or gastroesophageal refluxes (GER) can be associated, in certain infants, with serious complications such as laryngeal penetrations, pulmonary aspirations and acute cardiorespiratory events (bradycardias, apneas, oxygen desaturations). Nasal respiratory support (NRS), such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), is routinely used in preterm infants. However, the impact of NRS on these protective mechanisms of the lower airways remains largely unknown in this population. Project 1: Some teams fear that NRS might disrupt sucking–swallowing–breathing coordination and could induce severe cardiorespiratory events. Standardized bottle-feeding was assessed under video-fluoroscopy with and without induced tachypnea using our unique preterm lamb model. The article published in Front. Physiol. (DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.785086) shows that NRS do not impact the safety or efficiency of bottle-feeding or sucking–swallowing–breathing coordination in preterm lambs, even in the presence of tachypnea. Project 2: Significant cardiorespiratory events can be triggered in preterm infants during laryngeal chemoreflexes (LCRs) and esophageal reflexes. We previously showed that nCPAP blunted the cardiorespiratory inhibition induced by LCRs. The article published in Pediatr. Res. (DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02883-w) shows that nCPAP 6 cmH2O decreases the cardiorespiratory inhibition induced with LCRs, but not with esophageal reflexes in preterm lambs. This blunting effect is less marked with HFNC 7 L/min. Project 3: Nasal CPAP was previously shown to strongly inhibit GER in full-term lambs as well as in adult humans. The manuscript submitted in Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. also shows that nCPAP 6 cmH2O strongly inhibits GER in preterm lambs, although it increases air-containing swallows. In contrast, HFNC does not have an overall effect on GER in preterm lambs. Conclusion: Results reported in this thesis largely contribute to an improved understanding of the effects of nCPAP and HFNC on lower airway protective reflexes in a preclinical model of the preterm newborn. Neither of the tested NRS alters bottle-feeding. In addition, nCPAP is beneficial in the context of laryngeal chemoreflexes and GER. Our preclinical results must be confirmed through clinical studies in preterm infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it