MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066339959

John Milton Among the Neapolitans: Mansus: Texts, Contexts, Intertexts

2023· other· en· W7066339959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DysgeusiaLiquationDiafiltrationEmperipolesisTriacetinDurvalumab
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study maps the literary import of Naples upon Milton in the course of his one-month sojourn and beyond. As the first book devoted solely to Mansus, arguably the most accomplished of Milton’s neo-Latin writings pertaining to his Italian period, it offers a series of fresh interpretations of the poem. It does do by situating it alongside Milton’s seemingly voracious reading of contemporary Italian literature while abroad, by assessing the poem’s academic, religious, topographical, and linguistic contexts, and by analyzing its classical, neo-Latin, Italian, and English intertexts. Read in these wider contexts, Mansus emerges as a polyvocal poem, a text about other texts, embracing not only its addressee’s Latin encomium composed in Milton’s honor, but also, and essentially, his published (and, possibly, unpublished) works. It also draws upon the writings of two Italian poets who benefitted from Manso’s care and patronage, namely, Torquato Tasso and Giambattista Marino, alongside whose precedent Milton unabashedly aligns his Neapolitan experience. Mansus is at times quasi-Tassonian in its appropriation of theories of friendship outlined in Tasso’s dialogue on the subject, its articulation of epic plans, and its potential recasting of scenes from Manso’s biography of the poet. At others, it is quasi-Marinesque in Milton’s self-appropriation of a cenotaph erected by Manso in his domestic chapel in Naples, in the succinct critique of L’Adone, contextualized in terms of reader response, and in the conceits of Marinism, mirrored in Milton’s inventive Latinity.<br/><br/><br/>“The novelty of Haan’s study comes from her brilliant analysis of Milton’s evoking, imitating, and overwriting of Manso’s poetic sons and biographical subjects, Tasso and Marino. Her knowledge of Milton’s Latin poetry is unsurpassed and she shows herself in magisterial command of her scholarly field here.”<br/><br/>Professor Andrea Walkden, University of Toronto<br/><br/><br/>“Professor Haan succeeds magnificently in her scholarly exposition, which is a tour de force. Her method is unique in Milton studies, in that she combines careful archival bibliographical research with close analysis of the poem under scholarly scrutiny. The scholarship is quite extraordinary and the writing is exemplary.”<br/><br/>Professor Gordon Campbell, University of Leicester

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it