Implicaciones de la hospitalidad en la transversalidad del fenómeno turístico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El desarrollo de planes y programas establecidos por las administraciones publicas de turismo, enfocados al desarrollo de destinos, presenta una orientación hacia paradigmas positivistas, cada vez más alejados de la intrínseca y necesaria visión de alteridad que implica la hospitalidad. En respuesta, han considerado la aplicación de instrumentos denominados como transversales, es decir, que implican la participación de actores de los distintos órdenes de gobierno, bajo la limitante de que sus atribuciones responden únicamente a los diferentes reglamentos que los rigen. En este sentido, el presente artículo presenta una serie de reflexiones y análisis al respecto de las implicaciones de la hospitalidad dentro del fenómeno turístico, mas allá de la visión organicista del turismo como un sistema, incluidos sus equivocismos, con miras a logar un equilibrio transversal bajo el implícito de alteridad, representando en la acogida y la experiencia del visitante en el destino.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".