MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066410833

Identification of multiple-input, single-output, discrete transfer function models. Application to ankle stiffness.

2014· dissertation· en· W7066410833 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)StiffnessTorqueTransfer functionPosition (finance)Convergence (economics)AnkleJoint stiffness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic ankle joint stiffness defines the relationship between the position of the ankle and the torque acting about it and can be separated into intrinsic and reflex components.Under stationary conditions, intrinsic stiffness can be described by a linear second order system while reflex stiffness is described by a Hammerstein system whose input is delayed velocity.Given that reflex and intrinsic torque cannot be measured separately, there has been much interest in the development of system identification techniques to separate them analytically.To date, most methods have been nonparametric and as a result there is no direct link between the estimated parameters and those of the stiffness model.This thesis demonstrates that the ankle stiffness model can be approximated by a discrete-time, multiple input, single output linear transfer function model and introduces a novel algorithm for the identification of this class of models.As the algorithm is novel, proofs of the convergence and the existence of the solution are provided.Through simulations we show that the algorithm gives unbiased results even in the presence of large non-white noise.Application of the method to experimental data demonstrates that it produces results consistent with previous findings.3-5 A) Input position.B) Output torque, continuous-time simulation (blue line) and discrete-time simulation (red line).Zoom-in in the selected are of the C) Input position and, D) Output torque. . . .40 3-6 A) Input position.B) Difference between the output of the continuous and discrete time models. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 4-1 Block diagram of a Multiple-Input Single Output transfer function model with non-white disturbances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 6-1 Different components of the noise signal.a) GWN signal, b) 1 Hz low-pass filtered GWN signal, c) 60Hz sinusoidal and d) total noise added to the torque signal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 6-2 a) 10 s segment of the position input signal used in simulations, b) Amplitude distribution of the input signal. . . . . . . . . . . . . .101 x 6-3 a) Intrinsic Torque and b) Reflex torque. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102 6-4 a) Position input signal, b) total torque elicited by the position input signal displayed in panel a. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103 6-5 Total Torque (red line) and Observer Torque (blue line). . . . . . . .104 6-6 Identified intrinsic parameters K, B and I with MISO SRIV algorithm (panels a, b and c), Naive IV algorithm (panels d, e and f) and Matlab's PEM algorithm (panels g, h and i).Red line in each panel is the true value, gray dots are the results of the 100 simulated experiments, blue line is mean, the red shading represents one standard deviation and the blue shading is the 90% range. . . . . .105 6-7 Identified intrinsic parameters g, ω and ζ with MISO SRIV algorithm (panels a, b and c), Naive IV algorithm (panels d, e and f) and Matlab's PEM algorithm (panels g, h and i).Red line in each panel is the true value, gray dots are the results of the 100 simulated experiments, blue line is mean, the red shading represents one standard deviation and the blue shading is the 90% range.Note that in panels h) and i) the 95th percentile is out of the figure limits.1066-8 Identified shape of the nonlinearity in the 100 simulated experiments (blue line) and true nonlinearity used in simulation (red line).Algorithms : a) MISO SRIV, b) Naive IV, c) Matlabs's PEM and d) Parallel-Cascade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108 6-9 Identified intrinsic compliance with a) MISO SRIV, b) Naive IV, c) Matlab's PEM and d) Parallel-Cascade algorithms.Red lines represent the true values, blue lines the mean of the 100 simulated experiments and the blue shading are the 90% range (5th percentile to 95th percentile). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .109 6-10 Identified linear element of the reflex stiffness with a) MISO SRIV, b) Naive IV, c) Matlab's PEM and d) Parallel-Cascade algorithms.Red lines represent the true values, blue lines the mean of the 100 simulated experiments and the state blue shadows are the 90% range (5th percentile to 95th percentile). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .110 xi 6-11 %VAF between the reflex torque obtained with the true model and with the identified model.Algorithms : a) MISO SRIV, b) Naive IV, c) Matlabs's PEM and d) Parallel-Cascade. . . . . . . . . . . .111 6-12 %VAF between the intrinsic torque obtained with the true model and with the identified model.Algorithms : a) MISO SRIV, b) Naive IV, c) Matlabs's PEM and d) Parallel-Cascade. . . . . . . . . . . .112 6-13 %VAF between the total torque obtained with the true model and with the identified model.Algorithms : a) MISO SRIV, b) Naive IV, c) Matlabs's PEM and d) Parallel-Cascade. . . . . . . . . . . .113 6-14 %VAF between the total torque obtained with the true model and with the identified model using Kukreja's parametric algorithm . .114 6-15 Experimental apparatus.Subjects lay supine while their left foot is perturbed by an electrohydraulic actuator.Ankle position and torque are acquired and used to estimate reflex and intrinsic stiffness in real-time.Feedback information is displayed on LCD monitor hung over the subjects head. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207