MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066430563

Impacts of geomagnetic storms on trans-Canadian grids

2011· dissertation· en· W7066430563 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomagnetically induced currentEarth's magnetic fieldGeomagnetic stormTransformerStormSpace weatherSubstorm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impacts of Geomagnetic storms on Trans-Canadian GridsInduced "dc" currents due to geomagnetic storms have caused power system blackouts and transformer damages in the past. Statistically, large geomagnetic storms follow a 10-11 year sunspot cycle, but geomagnetic disturbances with significant impacts can occur at any time. The geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) have wide range of detrimental effects on otherwise normal operation of power systems, communication systems, railway systems, and can cause oil and gas pipeline corrosion. This thesis presents a method of estimating the magnitudes of terrestrial voltages; which is based on solving the magnetic diffusion equation. The method predicts the oft-quoted figure of "1 volt per kilometer" for the range of geomagnetic field variations (magnitudes and frequencies) and ground resistivity frequently encountered. The prediction formula has been validated by the plane wave method. Geomagnetic storms have the tendency to disrupt the normal operation and even lead to major power outages depending upon the intensity of geomagnetic activity; whereas the major effects include transformer equipment damage, relay tripping, SVC failures resulting in minor or major power outages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207