MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066440657

How Exposure to Personal Distress With and Without Self-Compassion Affects Emotional Distress Tolerance: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted in a Sample of University Students and a Sample of Community Adults

2022· dissertation· en· W7066440657 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistressFeelingPsychopathologyRandomized controlled trialEmotional distressTest (biology)Young adultCognition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emotional distress tolerance refers to the perceived ability to tolerate one’s negative emotions (Simons & Gaher, 2005). Low emotional distress tolerance is a transdiagnostic marker of psychopathology (Leyro et al., 2010) and is therefore important to target in psychological interventions. Cognitive behavioural theories suggest that to overcome low emotional distress tolerance, individuals need to expose themselves to their negative emotions and, in so doing, learn that experiencing negative emotions is more tolerable than they expected. However, when distress intolerant individuals participate in therapy involving such exposures, they find them unbearable (Belleau et al., 2017; Griffen et al., 2018) and terminate treatment early (Daughters et al., 2005; Niles et al., 2017). We theorized that self-compassion, which involves enacting a caring, curious stance toward one’s own distress with the intention of preventing and alleviating it (Gilbert, 2014), might make the experience of feeling negative emotions more bearable due to its soothing physiological effects (Kim et al., 2020). We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that, among individuals low in emotional distress tolerance, exposure to negative emotions with self-compassion, as compared to without and a placebo control condition, would lead to superior emotional distress tolerance and that this effect would occur indirectly via greater levels of soothing affect. We also sought to test the secondary hypotheses that exposure with self-compassion compared to without would have higher treatment acceptability and lead to less emotional avoidance over time. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, parallel-group, additive, superiority trial in a Canadian student sample (n = 126) recruited through a mid-sized Canadian university’s participant pool and an international community sample (n = 298) recruited through the Prolific participant pool, both of which comprised fluent English-speaking adults with below-average levels of emotional distress tolerance. In an online session, participants were asked to recall a distressing situation and then were randomly assigned through the randomizer function within Qualtrics at a ratio of 1:1:1 to perform one of three written tasks involving: 1) exposure to negative emotions (student sample n = 42, community sample n = 100); 2) exposure to negative emotions with self-compassion (student sample n = 43, community sample n = 98); or 3) a control distraction-based planning condition (student sample n = 41, community sample n = 100). Participants completed questionnaires immediately before and after their written intervention task and again one week later. ANCOVAs revealed that, controlling for baseline emotional distress tolerance levels, condition significantly predicted emotional distress tolerance levels immediately post-intervention, n2p = .02-.06. The exposure with self-compassion condition yielded higher post emotional distress tolerance than the pure exposure condition in both the student sample (d = 0.52) and community sample (d = 0.37). Further, in both samples, increased soothing affect during the intervention significantly mediated 65-67% of the effect of condition on post-intervention emotional distress tolerance levels. However, ANCOVAs also revealed that, controlling for baseline emotional distress tolerance levels, condition did not significantly predict emotional distress tolerance levels at the one-week follow-up, n2p = .02-.03. Further, results did not support our hypotheses that the self-compassion condition would result in greater treatment acceptability and emotion engagement. Although not all our hypotheses were supported, results across samples support a focus on helping individuals low in emotional distress tolerance to cultivate self-compassion when experiencing negative emotions. It seems that the soothing affect self-compassion promotes may help these individuals to learn that feeling their distress is more tolerable than they had anticipated. This study is registered with the US Clinical Trials Registry #NCT05284578 and was funded by SSHRC Insight Grant 435-2017-0062.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207