MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7066471526

Hyperbolic Stretching

2019· other· en· W7066471526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)NothingLift (data mining)WastingPhysical strengthStrength training
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperbolic Stretching puts down the dumbbells and teaches you how to use ancient stretching methods to increase your muscle mass, strength and flexibility in four weeks. There’s no need to put immense pressure on your joints by lifting heavy weights repetitively and there’s certainly no need to take prescription medications or some black market who-knows-what. This program uses nothing more than your own body and ancient unique stretches that are designed to improve your athletic performance, skills, strength, body shape and flexibility by pushing you beyond the survival muscle reflex. And can you really go wrong with all of that when you aren’t wasting away hours at the gym hoping to achieve the same? So, I took the stretching challenge and here’s what you can expect from Hyperbolic Stretching. Stretching goes far beyond a yoga practice and a slight toning of your body. This program shows you how increasing your flexibility and strength through stretching can be the fastest way to get the results you’re looking for. As a bonus, you don’t have to lift heavy weights or spend hours at the gym sweating up a storm and putting unnecessary pressure on your joints. Hyperbolic Stretching is a four-week online workout system designed to increase your strength, flexibility and gains in the comfort of your home with nothing more than your own body. You only need 8-minutes a day to complete the regime, and in four weeks, you can see a drastic improvement in your overall performance, athletic skills, strength and flexibility. But how is this the fastest way to boost your size, strength and flexibility? The program explains this in more depth but as a crash course, stretching has been used throughout history to increase strength – from cavemen to warriors, professional fighters and more because it is a survival trick that restructures the body and strengthens it as a whole. However, not all stretching is created equal and the methods learned in this program are not conventional stretches. They are ancient stretching methods that have been used for thousands of years but that have seemed to been forgotten about when it comes to strength training. But don’t be mistaken, these are just conventional stretches. The program focuses on ancient stretching tricks that push beyond the barrier that inhibits performance. This barrier is called the survival muscle reflex, or reciprocal muscle inhibition. Alex Larsson is the creator of Hyperbolic Stretching. He quit his job as a computer programmer to become a full-time professional flexibility and core strength expert. As of today, he has helped more than 16,000 people achieve significant gains through stretching. His regime and methods are now being discussed at MMA gym, martial arts dojos, yoga studies, and sport establishments in Canada, Australia, the United States, Asia and Europe. And everything he teaches his clients through one-on-one sessions can be found in this program. Hyperbolic Stretching is a unique system that focuses on ancient stretching tricks to increase gains, strength and flexibility. It includes an abundance of valuable information about the power of stretching and how it can help you achieve your goals, as well as a four-week program that is laid out for you with specific exercises to do for each week. So, not only does it give you a ton of information that’s needed to understand the benefits of obtaining high levels of elasticity but it also gives you the regime needed to turn your newfound knowledge into action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4530.230

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)→French-language works237,207→