Gröbner Geometry for Hessenberg Varieties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study Hessenberg varieties in type A via their local defining equations, called patch ideals. We focus on two main classes of Hessenberg varieties: those associated to a regular nilpotent operator and to those associated to a semisimple operator. In the setting of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties, which are known to be smooth and irreducible, we determine that their patch ideals are triangular complete intersections, as defined by Da Silva and Harada. For semisimple Hessenberg varieties, we give a partial positive answer to a conjecture of Insko and Precup that a given family of set-theoretic local defining ideals are radical. A regular nilpotent Hessenberg Schubert cell is the intersection of a Schubert cell with a regular nilpotent Hessenberg variety. Following the work of the author with Da Silva, Harada, and Rajchgot, we construct an embedding of the regular nilpotent Hessenberg Schubert cells into the coordinate chart of the regular nilpotent Hessenberg variety corresponding to the longest-word permutation in Bruhat order. This allows us to use work of Da Silva and Harada to conclude that regular nilpotent Hessenberg Schubert cells are also local triangular complete intersections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".