MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7066526673

The impact of prior professional degrees and experiences on Manitoba Master of Physician Assistant Studies graduates didactic year, clinical year, and first job in relation to CanMEDS-PA: A quality improvement survey response study

2022· other· en· W7066526673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Quality (philosophy)Relation (database)Survey data collectionMEDLINESurvey research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Manitoba Master of Physician Assistant Studies (MPAS) program attracts applicants with a variety of different pre-professional degrees and experiences. Currently there is very little research with respect to whether certain pre-professional degrees or experiences have an impact of PA students’ overall success throughout the program. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if Manitoba MPAS graduates feel that their pre-professional degrees, healthcare/clinical experiences, and non-healthcare/clinical experiences had an impact on their success in their didactic year, clinical year, and first job as a PA in relation to the CanMEDs-PA competencies. Methods: This quality improvement cross-sectional survey response study used an online survey sent to Manitoba MPAS graduates to obtain quantitative data and emergent themes related to the perceived impact of pre-professional degrees, healthcare/clinical experience and non-healthcare/clinical experience on student success. Results: Forty-seven survey responses met the inclusion criteria to be included in the study. Pre-professional degrees were felt to be most impactful during didactic year, with 76.59% of respondents reporting this. Of those who had healthcare/clinical experience, 80.00% felt this to have an impact during their didactic year, clinical year and first job as a PA. Non-healthcare/clinical experience were felt to be most impactful on clinical year, as noted by 65.71% of respondents who had this experience. Conclusion: Manitoba MPAS graduates felt their pre-professional degrees and experiences had an impact on their success in their didactic year, clinical year and, to a lesser extent, their first job as a PA. Specific degrees or experiences over others were not noted to be particularly influential in aiding in this success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→