MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066557217

Incoming Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney Victory Remarks : CSPAN : March 10, 2025 11:35pm-12:11am EDT

2025· other· en· W7066557217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictoryPrime ministerGovernorMistakeGeorge (robot)Government (linguistics)Whip (tree)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"We didn't ask for this fight, but Canadians are always ready when someone else drops the gloves. So the Americans, they should make no mistake -- in trade as in hockey, Canada will win," incoming Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said during victory remarks after winning his Liberal Party's leadership election, also securing his place as the leader of Canada's federal government. His remarks focused on escalating trade tensions with the United States, Canada's largest trading partner, after President Trump imposed new tariffs on Canadian goods and services in a bid to cajole Canada to boost security and cut drug flows across its border with the U.S. Mr. Carney, a former governor of the Bank of Canada, was expected to within days of this speech be officially named to the top post by Canada's governor general, its official representative from Canadian King Charles III. Sponsor: Canada | Liberal Party

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5010.232

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicArchaeological and Geological StudiesFrench-language works237,207