MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066604996

Keeping Food on the Table; A Quarterly Review of the State of Hunger in Minnesota; 1st Quarter 2009; Child Hunger

2009· dataset· en· W7066604996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIssue Lab (Candid) · 2009
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Supplemental Nutrition Assistance ProgramUnemploymentState (computer science)WelfareFood stampsFood supplyToll
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hunger Solutions Minnesota released their second volume of Keeping Food on the Table, a quarterly review that tracks the state of hunger in Minnesota. This issue is a review of nutrition safety net programs that help alleviate child hunger. The first quarter of 2009 witnessed a record year-to-date increase in food shelf visits in Minnesota. Visits to Minnesota food shelves totaled 614,344 in the first quarter. That represents an overall increase of 28%. Child visits increased from 191,756 in the first quarter of 2008 to 236,652 in 2009. The recession, high food costs and 8.2% unemployment are factors that increase food insecurity in Minnesota. These factors continue to take a toll on low-income Minnesota families and their ability to provide nourishing meals to their children. Along with more need for nutrition support, Minnesota has seen a 6.2% increase in welfare caseloads in the past year. These factors increase the number of children eligible for safety-net programs. "The need for hunger relief in Minnesota is critical. The increase in child hunger is one of the economic benchmarks that drives HSM to increase access to safety-net nutrition programs like Food Support and the Summer Food Service Program," said Colleen Moriarty, executive director of Hunger Solutions Minnesota. "Food Support and other programs help to lift children and their families out of poverty." In the report, HSM also provides an overview and recommendations to Congress on the 2009 Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act. The Act will be renewed later this Fall. HSM believes that the programs within the bill can reduce childhood hunger and food insecurity. The safety net programs, such as school lunch, breakfast and the Summer Food Service Program, help improve child nutrition and health, and enhance child development and school readiness. Also in response to the rising need, Hunger Solutions Minnesota (HSM) launched the "Minnesota Food HelpLine" that provides a vital service to Minnesotans at risk for hunger. Callers to the Minnesota Food HelpLine (1-888-711-1151) will receive help with the Food Support (Food Stamps) program and referrals to emergency food assistance in their area. HSM provides multilingual Food Support application assistance and eligibility screening for callers statewide. The report includes statistics from the first month of the newly launched HelpLine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssue Lab (Candid)French-language works237,207