Invocation décoloniale et permanence coloniale chez les jeunes souverainistes québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avec une approche croisant théorie du point de vue situé, les Settler colonial studies et les études critiques de la blanchité, je cherche à comprendre comment la colonialité se dit, s’utilise, se décompose et se recompose dans le mouvement souverainiste québécois autour des notions de blanchité et d’oppression. Comment – via quels processus de subjectivation, quels discours et quelles pratiques – les Québécois·es blanc·he·s francophones prétendent à la condition colonisée afin de revendiquer leur libération, à l’aide du même mécanisme qui sert à opprimer et coloniser les communautés autochtones? À travers une analyse de leur compte Instagram et d’entretiens semi-dirigés tenus avec ces militant·e·s, j’examine comment les questions coloniale et raciale interviennent dans le façonnement de leur rapport au temps, à l’identité et au territoire. Mes conclusions pointent le rôle significatif que jouent les mouvements souverainistes québécois dans la pérennisation de la suprématie blanche et du colonialisme au Québec. \n_____________________________________________________________________________ \nMOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : colonialité, blanchité, identité, race, colonialisme de peuplement, souveraineté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".