MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066649047

Kostenefficiëntie vergroten door verschuiving van zorg? Laatste nieuws in Nieuwsbrief Alliantie Voeding Gelderse Vallei

2014· other· nl· W7066649047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-Environmental Systems Modeling · 2014
Typeother
Languagenl
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)BeneficiaryAuthorizationQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nederland kampt met stijgende kosten in de gezondheidszorg. Om de zorg meer kosteneffectief te maken, stimuleert de overheid transities van interventieprogramma’s van de tweede- en derdelijnszorg naar eerstelijnszorg. Wageningen Universiteit onderzocht recent de voor- en nadelen van de verplaatsing van het behandelprogramma AanTafel! Aan Tafel! AanTafel! is een succesvol behandelprogramma voor kinderen van 3 tot en met 7 jaar met overgewicht. AanTafel! Is ontwikkeld door Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei in samenwerking met Wageningen Universiteit. Eind 2013 is het programma ingezet in de eerstelijnszorg in een aantal wijken in Veenendaal. Over het verloop van dergelijke transities is nog weinig bekend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocio-Environmental Systems ModelingFrench-language works237,207