MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066709756

J.C. Penney reports 2Q loss

2016· other· en· W7066709756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectrical and Electromagnetic Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenueQuarter (Canadian coin)Investment (military)Operator (biology)Postal serviceDeadweight loss
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J.C. Penney Co. is reporting a loss of $56 million in its fiscal second quarter. The department store operator says it had a loss of 18 cents, which surpassed Wall Street expectations. Texas-based J.C. Penney is reporting a second quarter loss of $56 million.On a per-share basis, the department store operator says it had a loss of 18 cents, which surpassed Wall Street expectations.The average estimate of 12 analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for a loss of 15 cents per share.J.C. Penney posted revenue in the period of $2.92 billion, which did not meet forecasts.Penney shares have climbed 49 percent since the beginning of the year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4100.324

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicElectrical and Electromagnetic ResearchFrench-language works237,207