Investigating the effects of the blewit mushroom Lepista nuda on the community composition of its soil environment.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lepista nuda, or the blewit, is a saprotrophic fungus that produces fairy rings and mycelial mats. Studies have revealed its antimicrobial properties including hyphal penetration/consumption of microbes, and reduced incidence of disease on plants with culture filtrates/extracts. However, field studies are limited. Here, soil was sampled before and twice after inoculating with manure and either living or autoclaved Lepista mycelium in coastal regions of Newfoundland Canada. Arthropod, nematode, bacterial and fungal members of the soil community were identified and their relative abundance determined by metabarcoding analyses of soil-extracted DNAs. Community differences were revealed for fungi, bacteria, and nematode samples. Diversity and richness increased for bacteria only. Differential abundance analysis revealed many significant OTUs across sampling seasons for bacteria, fungi, and arthropod samples, many of which are known to be agriculturally or medically significant. Results support future investigations on Lepista potential in intercropping agricultural systems as an edible co-crop and biopesticide/biofertilizer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".