La promoció de la lectura a les llibreries de Catalunya (2020-2023)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’analitza la transformació de les llibreries catalanes durant el període 2020-2023, marcat per l’impacte de la pandèmia de covid. Un dels canvis principals fou la digitalització, amb l’obertura de botigues en línia, inicialment poc freqüent, però esdevinguda essencial. La pandèmia també va reforçar l’autoestima del sector i va posar en relleu la importància de la lectura, amb un augment de vendes i noves iniciatives com Llibreries Obertes, que va permetre la compra de llibres de proximitat durant el confinament. A més, es consolida un model de llibreria petita, sostenible i arrelada al territori, encara que també hi ha llibreries de dimensions mitjanes amb un fort suport inicial. Les llibreries han esdevingut espais culturals dinàmics amb activitats variades, que han contribuït a la cohesió comunitària. En un futur, es destaca la importància d’integrar aliances digitals i analògiques per mantenir la singularitat, proximitat i sostenibilitat del model cultural i econòmic de les llibreries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".