Jeux d'acteurs et enchevêtrement des vecteurs d'action : sociologie qualitative et approche interdisciplinaire du processus de patrimonialisation de lâusine de Paulilles devenue «site classé»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse repose sur une analyse empirique du processus de patrimonialisation de l'ancienne dynamiterie Nobel située dans le département des Pyrénées orientales, en France, devenue site classé ouvert au public depuis le 28 juin 2008. La fermeture de l'unité de production de dynamite, en 1984, a laissé le site à l'abandon et ses ouvriers sans emploi. De plus, cette situation a provoqué de nombreuses convoitises de promotion immobilière et engendré de nombreuses controverses. La recherche effectuée explore les différentes étapes ayant mené à l'acte public de classement au titre de la loi française du 2 mai 1930, elle analyse les jeux d'acteurs divers (associations, ouvriers, médias, collectivités territoriales, agents publics, etc.) et met en évidence les différents vecteurs du processus de patrimonialisation résultant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".