MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066897337

KASKA LEGAL UNDERSTANDINGS OF LAND

2023· dissertation· en· W7066897337 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPerspective (graphical)NarrativeEveryday lifeGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research explores Kaska understandings of land and law, for it is these understandings that inform the Kaska communities’ approach to settler governments and their decisions. Respect for animate and inanimate beings is by far the most important principle for the Kaska people. Ā́’ī, a Kaska term, is commonly translated into English as ‘taboo’ or ‘respect’ but it means much more than that. Complex moral narratives involving ā́’ī are told to reiterate responsibility, respect, humility, kinship, and consequences of inappropriate behavior – it is a way of life. This reveals that there are multiple frameworks for understanding the world and western systems are not universal. Kaska reality is most commonly expressed through Kaska oral history, stories, and traditions. This reality represents how Kaska people interpret the world around them and how they employ different strategies for living. Despite the ongoing prevalence of this concept among the Kaska people’s everyday lives, governmental officials have not seriously taken it into account. These worldviews are key to understanding the endurance and strength of Indigenous peoples, cultures, and languages. Based on the research, the only way to understand the Kaska society is to take concepts such as ā́’ī, ā́’nenzén, and dene k’éh gū́s’ān into account. This research is significant because it centers an Indigenous perspective that has otherwise been oppressed by settler law and policies. Indigenous life in the Yukon has only been seriously researched by a handful of people, many of whom are not from the north. Further, there is limited contemporary research on Yukon First Nations, especially in the social sciences. While the Kaska ā́’ī concept and equivalent ontological practices have been researched by others, its present application to Kaska life are limited. While settler laws have impacted Kaska laws, it is clear from this research that the land has remained a source of law. I contend that the land and its teachings are central to being a good Kaska person. My research will produce new knowledge on how these practices inform our approach to land claims and to the government. Kaska people are living ā́’ī and dene k’éh gū́s’ān, it is their reality. This research will provide a thesis, a report, and community presentations to Kaska communities and will empower our communities to be better able to argue for our rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.034
Scholarly communication0.0080.012
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207