KASKA LEGAL UNDERSTANDINGS OF LAND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research explores Kaska understandings of land and law, for it is these understandings that inform the Kaska communities’ approach to settler governments and their decisions. Respect for animate and inanimate beings is by far the most important principle for the Kaska people. Ā́’ī, a Kaska term, is commonly translated into English as ‘taboo’ or ‘respect’ but it means much more than that. Complex moral narratives involving ā́’ī are told to reiterate responsibility, respect, humility, kinship, and consequences of inappropriate behavior – it is a way of life. This reveals that there are multiple frameworks for understanding the world and western systems are not universal. Kaska reality is most commonly expressed through Kaska oral history, stories, and traditions. This reality represents how Kaska people interpret the world around them and how they employ different strategies for living. Despite the ongoing prevalence of this concept among the Kaska people’s everyday lives, governmental officials have not seriously taken it into account. These worldviews are key to understanding the endurance and strength of Indigenous peoples, cultures, and languages. Based on the research, the only way to understand the Kaska society is to take concepts such as ā́’ī, ā́’nenzén, and dene k’éh gū́s’ān into account. This research is significant because it centers an Indigenous perspective that has otherwise been oppressed by settler law and policies. Indigenous life in the Yukon has only been seriously researched by a handful of people, many of whom are not from the north. Further, there is limited contemporary research on Yukon First Nations, especially in the social sciences. While the Kaska ā́’ī concept and equivalent ontological practices have been researched by others, its present application to Kaska life are limited. While settler laws have impacted Kaska laws, it is clear from this research that the land has remained a source of law. I contend that the land and its teachings are central to being a good Kaska person. My research will produce new knowledge on how these practices inform our approach to land claims and to the government. Kaska people are living ā́’ī and dene k’éh gū́s’ān, it is their reality. This research will provide a thesis, a report, and community presentations to Kaska communities and will empower our communities to be better able to argue for our rights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".