L'admission des femmes à l'Université Laval : 1901-1945
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C'est à partir des constats de retard et de différence d'orientation entre le processus de l'admission des femmes à l'Université Laval et celui qui est généralement observé en Occident, que nous abordons cette étude. En effet, l'Université de Québec accepte ses premières étudiantes plus de soixante ans après les premières admissions universitaires féminines dans le monde occidental et temporise encore plus longuement l'admission de candidates dans les programmes menant aux professions libérales. Cette étude de l'admission des femmes à l'Université Laval met en relief les facteurs responsables de l'accession tardive et les facteurs qui ont finalement favorisé l'ouverture de l'institution à la clientèle féminine. L'étude porte sur une période comprise entre 1901 et 1945, c'est-à-dire entre le moment de la première demande d'admission (refusée) d'une femme et le moment où, après une première période de développement, la progression de l'admission féminine connaît un ralentissement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".