La ambigüedad calderoniana en relación a los moriscos en El Tuzaní de la Alpujarra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La mayoría de la atención crítica que ha recibido El Tuzaní de la Alpujarra de Pedro Calderón de la Barca durante las últimas tres décadas ha sido enfocada en la cuestión de la postura ideológica de Calderón con respecto a los moriscos. Este estudio sigue en esta línea, pero desafía la conclusión casi unánime en la crítica reciente de que Calderón manifiesta en El Tuzaní una postura tolerante e incluso simpatizante en cuanto a la minoría. A través de un estudio detallado de la caracterización de los personajes moriscos y viejo-cristianos en varias escenas claves, y teniendo en cuenta el contexto en el que apareció la comedia, se demuestra que El Tuzaní manifiesta los estereotipos literarios y los prejuicios anti-moriscos de su época, y que la postura ideológica del dramaturgo con respecto a la minoría es ambigua.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".