MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066996182

Is the tide finally turning?

2013· other· en· W7066996182 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOAR@UM (University of Malta) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpellEconomic JusticePoliticsLegislationPrime ministerQuarter (Canadian coin)Statement (logic)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Local environmentalists must have received a boost in recent weeks following the landmark court decisions on two important issues. Mr Justice Anthony Ellul set the house on fire by ruling that caravan owners permanently parked at Little Armier have no legal title to the land and that they should be evicted so that the immediate foreshore remains in the public domain. However, the ruling will probably not spell the end of the decades-long saga at L-Aħrax, where the thousands of squatters will use their lobby’s sheer electoral weight as their trump card. In fact, Prime Minister Joseph Muscat was quick to say he will seek legal advice before acting on the ruling and that the ruling can always be appealed. For those who have campaigned long and hard to see all squatters evicted from L-Aħrax, this statement comes as a slap in the face. Muscat should realise that the historic opportunity of finally making L-Aħrax ‘tagħna lkoll’ once again is too good to waste. If this wasn’t enough, the illegal caravan owners have demanded an alternative site to which they can be transferred. Such ‘compensation’ should not even be discussed or considered since, if granted, it would set a dangerous precedent that a law-flouting lobby can always be accommodated if it is large enough.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0180.013
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0120.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOAR@UM (University of Malta)Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207