MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067005832

Kinetics of the inhibition of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II by pea protein-derived peptides

2004· dissertation· en· W7067005832 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonial History and Postcolonial Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPeptideCircular dichroismCalmodulinProtein kinase AKineticsEnzymeAmino acidPhosphorylationHydrolysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calmodulin (CaM) is a ubiquitous protein present in all living cells and is involved in calcium-mediated activation of various physiologically important enzymes.Agents that bind to CaM can prevent activity of CaM-dependent protein kinase ll (CaMKll), an enzyme that has been implicaied in the initiation and propagation of chronic diseases.Agents that decrease or block the activity of CaMKll can reduce or eliminate excessive protein phosphorylation and, therefore, minimize or prevent associated pathological conditions.lnhibitors of CaM usually have either a net positive charge or a net hydrophobic character.Therefore, pea protein isolate with high levels of positively charged amino acids was enzymatically hydrolyzed to generate peptides with net positive charges.The peptides were separated on a cation-exchange column to obtain two peptide fractions that differed in level of positive charges.CaM-binding determination showed that fraction #2 had higher contents of basic amino acid residues and almost three times affinity for CaM when compared with fraction #1 .Enzyme inhibition kinetics was studied for peptides to see if they could inhibit CaMKll activity.lnhibition by the two peptide fractions followed a competitive manner and fraction #2 had a higher inhibition constant than fraction #1 .Fluorescence spectrophotometry and circular dichroism (CD) were used to determine the structural changes of CaM in the presence of enzyme and inhibitory peptides.The results showed thai interactions between CaM and inhibitory peptides led to the unfolding of CaM and exposure of previously buried hydrophobic groups.Peptide #2 was more effective than peptide #1 in causing unfolding of CaM.CD studies showed that the inhibitory peptides reduced the amount of c¿-helix siructure, a conformation that seems to be required for optimum interaction of CaM with target enzymes.Excessive unfolding of CaM by the inhibitory peptides led to increased interaction with CaMKll followed by unfolding of enzyme structure and reduction in enzyme activity.lt was concluded that pea protein-derived low molecular weight peptides with net positive charges interacted strongly and caused excessive unfolding of CaM, which reduced the ability of CaM to activate CaMKll; howeve¡ this inhibition can be removed by increasing the concentrations of CaM. ACKNOWLEGMENTFirst and foremost, I would sincerely like to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicColonial History and Postcolonial StudiesFrench-language works237,207