La gouvernance de l’eau et la planification relative aux bassins hydrographiques dans les communautés des Premières Nations de la Colombie-Britannique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les processus de gouvernance des Premières Nations sont particulièrement complexes \npuisqu’ils mettent en jeu toute une série de lois et d’institutions fédérales ainsi que le plus \nvaste contexte de l’autonomie gouvernementale de première importance pour ces \ncommunautés. Cette recherche améliorera la compréhension globale des interactions entre \nles Premières Nations et le cadre actuel de la gouvernance de l’eau en Colombie-Britannique \net des interactions complexes entretenues par les Premières Nations au sein de ce cadre. \nEn outre, elle dégagera les perspectives des Premières Nations concernant les barrières et \nles priorités relatives à l’amélioration de la gouvernance de l’eau en Colombie-Britannique, \nà l’échelle provinciale, tout en mettant l’accent sur la gouvernance au niveau de bassins \nhydrographiques individuels. L’examen de ces dimensions illuminera les types de réactions \nnécessaires à la réalisation de réels progrès relativement à ces enjeux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".