MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067010092

La féminisation de quelques noms de métiers dans Le Monde en France et Le Devoir au Québec au début du 21ème siècle.

2020· article· fr· W7067010092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDalarna University College Electronic Archive · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)FrenchLinguistic analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans ce mémoire, nous avons étudié la féminisation de neuf noms de métiers dans un corpus délimité du Monde en France et du Devoir au Québec pour les trois périodes de 2001, 2010, et 2019, et les facteurs qui la conditionnent. Nous avons examiné les approches différentes dans les deux entités francophones, et ce que dit la grammaire française sur le genre grammatical et la forme féminine. Notre but a été de déterminer les obstacles au développement de la forme féminine, et, en suivant la méthode de la linguiste Itsuko Fujimura, d’essayer de comprendre les facteurs linguistiques qui jouent un rôle dans le progrès parfois lent de cette féminisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalarna University College Electronic ArchiveSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207