MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067060740

La masonería en Asturias 1808-1940

2013· dissertation· es· W7067060740 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueConsultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent (particle physics)Context (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El trabajo analiza los rasgos fundamentales del desarrollo de la masonería en Asturias, desde la guerra de la independencia hasta el final de la guerra civil. Va precedido de una serie de consideraciones sobre el origen de la institución masónica e incluye el estudio básico del marco legislativo español en el que se enmarca su devenir histórico. Se destacan, como rasgos específicos, el carácter tardío de los orígenes de la masonería en Asturias, su implantación relativamente fuerte en la etapa de la Restauración y su protagonismo en la lucha por el establecimiento de una sociedad laica y democrática. En el primer tercio del siglo, continuando el desarrollo de la institución, llama la atención la participación en logias masónicas de destacadas figuras políticas (M. Álvarez, Quintanilla, Teodomiro Menéndez), el importante protagonismo de masones en la República y su apoyo al bando leal en la guerra civil, acabada la cual se iniciaba una feroz persecución contra toda corriente democrática, incluida la masonería.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConsultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte)Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207