Le costume en Beauce, 1920-1960 : tradition, innovation et régionalisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peut-on parler d'un costume régional beauceron? Afin de répondre à cette question, le premier chapitre présente les rapports vêtement/tradition, en identifiant les éléments que l'on peut considérer traditionnels, d'une part dans les vêtements eux-mêmes, d'autres part dans les pratiques vestimentaires. Ces éléments sont analysés en considérant l'influence des contextes historiques et idéologiques de la période 1920- 1960. Le second chapitre observe la manière dont s'intègrent les nouveautés vestimentaires dans ce contexte de survie des pratiques traditionnelles. Enfin, l'analyse de la création de costumes régionaux beaucerons et québécois, à des fins économiques et identitaires, pose la question de la place que ceux-ci occupent dans l'imaginaire collectif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".