MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067065688

Legal and institutional aspects of Latin-American space cooperation AQUARELSat: The Water Monitoring Constellation

2010· dissertation· en· W7067065688 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLeiden Repository (Leiden University) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement ÉconomiquesU.S. Geological SurveySerbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsWorld Health OrganizationEuropean CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUNICEFCanadian Space AgencyComisión Nacional de Actividades EspacialesPan American Health OrganizationUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural OrganizationEuropean Space AgencyInter-American Development BankAgência Espacial BrasileiraInstituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica
KeywordsCLARITYSpace (punctuation)Space lawConstellationLatin Americans
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1960s Latin-American experts have supported the idea of regionalspace cooperation. Nevertheless, the way to implement this idea in legal termshas not been found yet. The lack of legal clarity in space cooperation haslimited its implementation in the region; thus, this research addresses the legaloptions available to Latin American countries for implementing regional spacecooperation, evolving from a non-institutional model to consolidated institutionalmodels of space cooperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeiden Repository (Leiden University)Same topicComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207