MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067065688

Legal and institutional aspects of Latin-American space cooperation AQUARELSat: The Water Monitoring Constellation

2010· dissertation· en· W7067065688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLeiden Repository (Leiden University) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement ÉconomiquesU.S. Geological SurveySerbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsWorld Health OrganizationEuropean CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUNICEFCanadian Space AgencyComisión Nacional de Actividades EspacialesPan American Health OrganizationUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural OrganizationEuropean Space AgencyInter-American Development BankAgência Espacial BrasileiraInstituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica
KeywordsCLARITYSpace (punctuation)Space lawConstellationLatin Americans
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1960s Latin-American experts have supported the idea of regionalspace cooperation. Nevertheless, the way to implement this idea in legal termshas not been found yet. The lack of legal clarity in space cooperation haslimited its implementation in the region; thus, this research addresses the legaloptions available to Latin American countries for implementing regional spacecooperation, evolving from a non-institutional model to consolidated institutionalmodels of space cooperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it