Leakage of CO<sub>2</sub> Through Abandoned Wells: Role of Corrosion of Cement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential leakage of CO from a geological storage site through existing wells represents a major concern. An analysis of well distribution in the Viking Formation in the Alberta basin, a mature sedimentary basin representative for North American basins, shows that a CO plume and/or acidified brine may encounter up to several hundred wells. If carbon dioxide is geologically stored in regions, such as this, that have experienced intensive exploration for petroleum products, the acidified brine will come into contact with numerous abandoned wells. Corrosion of the cement that seals the well could lead to rapid leakage, so it is essential to determine the duration and intensity of exposure to the acid. Detailed numerical simulations with Dynaflow, incorporating a flash calculation to find the phase distribution and speciation in the brine, indicate that the carbonated brine may spend years in contact with the cement in abandoned wells. Preliminary results from an ongoing experimental study of cement corrosion indicate that the rate of attack is rapid, when the pH of the solution is low, so the risk of leakage will be high if the acidic brine can flow through an annulus and bring fresh acid into contact with the cement. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".