MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067082065

The lake as a vessel for life: an architectural response to connecting leisure landscapes about the Muskoka Lakes

2021· dissertation· en· W7067082065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSpatial and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)LuckPlacemakingGlobalizationPeriod (music)TemporalityNatural (archaeology)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Examining the anthropogenic change over the last two hundred years, Canada’s landscape at large has been molded into that of a globalized society. Often by means of the infrastructure that connects these economies, the people that drive them, drive upon the roads and make use of these same modes of transportation as well. The research will focus on the necessity of providing alternative modes of conveyance about the community at both the local but also provincial scales. As means of connecting urban civilizations become safer, faster and more efficient, our own vision of space and time trend towards that of a compressed reality[1]. A reality whereby one place is just as readily accessible to the average citizen as the next, as if distance and – with any luck – the emissions that coincide with traversing any given landscape are troubles of the past. Now, as we rely upon contemporary technology more and more to provide an immediacy of experience, that very experience estranges perceptions of landscapes and places that are not of their own corporeality[2]. Thus, the question is posed; what subverted intentions do people’s metaphysical preconceptions of one place, impose onto the next when engaging in true corporeality? In a period in which transient and trans-local lifestyles are colliding with those of domestic comfort across numerous temporal and spatial agendas. How then, do local populations perceive and interpret the globalization of space brought upon by these trans-local residents – daytime or seasonal – that are more often imposed upon localities rather than discussed? In a manner of collaboration rather than apprehensive co-existence, can local, year-round architectural programming begin to reimagine the vernacular practices within a given context, provided a history of translocality? Without affecting the landscapes that continue to facilitate these exchanges of people, knowledge, and economics amongst these different populations in an adverse manner, but rather instill a context specific sense of year-round resiliency? How might the design of civic spaces within these inherently trans-local destinations act as an inclusive space for all to experience? Extrapolating from the brief yet thorough history of Ontario’s cottage and lodging culture about the Muskoka Lakes. Colonial-European settlement has played a significant role in how the ethnography of rural and urban Canadian lives at large, have taken form – both in architectural and societal manifestations. Inadvertently, the privatization of lake-frontage within the Muskoka Lakes has been a subject of historic subversion and contemporary discussion since discovery. Still to this day, finding no sustainable resolve. On a seasonal basis, the area has become so saturated with an industry that depends upon the influx of non-permanent residents, such that it promotes exclusivity upon the lakes, as the further privatization of lodging ensues. Both, as the translocal “cottage” and archetypal Muskokan “resort” establish themselves as globalized commodity, rather than corporeal experience. In examining the past, with contemporary and historic modes of lodging upon the lakes acting as both access and destination, how can the reinterpretation of the architecture and social structuring of past resorts provide a new paradigm to act as precedent at larger scales, advocating for interconnected communities and landscapes. In that the implicit biases assumed by each of three populations – the local, trans-local, and day-visitor – trend towards solidarity and sustainability for all. The overt position that this paper will take is that of the apprehensive resident, concerned with the privatization of the Muskoka Lakes so that generations to come may transcend temporal constraint of travelling to and from the area to enjoy the rejuvenating, embodied experiences that this unique landscape provides those who reside upon it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicSpatial and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207