MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067109350

La producción cerámica medieval de Murcia

2009· other· en· W7067109350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotteryChronologyMiddle AgesSettlement (finance)Quarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Archaeological evidence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[EN] This article gives a general overview and chronology for pottery production in medieval Murcia, from the foundation of the city by Abd al-Rahman in 825 AD. Murcia was an active centre of pottery production in the tenth century, as is confirmed by finds of wasters from the Muslim potter of San Nicolas whose products reveal a wide repertoire of forms, techniques and decorative motifs including glazed vessels in green and manganese.
\nAlthough the precise date is unknown, there is archaeological and documentary evidence to show that lustreware production began in Murcia between the twerlfth century and the first half of the thirteenth century. This is confirmed by chemical analysis of samples from the city of Murcia itself and the deserted settlement at Siyasa (Cieza, Murcia). Some lustreware bacini on the facades of Italian churches have been identified as Murcian products, and these reflect the fluid commercial relations between the Kingdom of Ibn Mardanis and the Italian republics which existed at this time.
\nSettlement desertion was one of the results of the reconquest of the city by the Christians and there are numerous archaeological sites whose latest contexts correspond to the second quarter of the thirteenth century. These later contexts profide most of the ceramic evidence for medieval Murcia and include a wide range of forms, sgraffito techniques on manganese and applied decoration usually combined with incision and stamping. In particular, it is worth highlighting the production of reposaderos or supports for storage jars and jugs which are of varying type and complexity. Coarsewares of this period are also of high quality: heat resistant cooking pots of all sizes with fine walls and lids with glazed interior surfaces; miniature ovens for cooking; glazed open forms for the table (deep dish, bowls, and jofainas); alcadafes or large bowls, sometimes glazed; large jars for carrying water; lids for different types of vessels; and lamps.
\nAfter the thirteenth century little is known of pottery production in Murcia, although there may be mudejar centres which continued to imitate earlier styles such as sgraffito techniques over manganese.
\nDuring the fourteenth century craftsmanship continued to decline in Murcia ant the authorities were forced to seek new privileges in an attempt to encourage artisans to settle in the city. There are numerous documentary references to the scarcity of potters at this time. It seems that in the fifteenth-century coarsewares, cooking pots and storage jars of low quality were produced locally and in small quantities whilst quality pieces had to be imported from other centres, such as Valencia or Italy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.110 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207