kontribusi bumd terhadap pendapatan asli daerah pada perumda air minum tirta gemilang kab. pasaman barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Keuangan daerah memiliki hak-hak daerah yang dapat dinilai dengan uang yang tercermin dalam pendapatan daerah. Digunakan untuk membiayai berbagai pengeluaran pemerintah berhubungan dengan tanggung jawabnya sebagai pelayan publik (public service). \nPendapatan daerah pada dasarnya merupakan penerimaan daerah guna meningkatan aktiva dan penurunan utang dari berbagai sumber dalam periode tahun anggaran yang bersangkutan. Kekayaan daerah merupakan (income) untuk menjalankan roda perekonomian daerah. Income tersebut biasa disebut dengan Pendapatan Asli Daerah. \nPendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) adalah sumber penerimaan murni dari daerah, yang merupakan modal utama bagi daerah sebagai biaya penyelenggaraan, pemeliharaan dan pengembangan dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan, Pendapatan daerah bersumber dari hasil pajak daerah, retribusi daerah, kakayaan daerah yang dipisahkan, dan lain-lain PAD yang sah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.087 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".