La jeune femme ambiguë à l'intérieur de l'image-récit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire création vous propose de découvrir, l'espace d'un instant, le monde onirique d'une jeune fille refusant de grandir. Il s'agit d'un texte d'accompagnement l'exposition La Jeune Femme Ambiguë présentée en fin de parcours de la Maîtrise en art. \n \nMa production met en image les fantasmes, les rêves et l'inconscient de la jeune femme ambiguë. Cette dernière évoque autant le malaise face aux autres que sa naïveté. Cette jeune femme nous transporte à l'intérieur d'un récit suggéré par des mises en scènes picturales et des mises en espace d'objets et de personnages colorés. Ce récit mis en images fera voyager le spectateur dans un univers ambigu, à la limite du rêve infantile féminin et de la réalité humaine. \n \nL'idée est de suggérer aux spectateurs des images-récits. Mon travail explore donc l'installation de plusieurs tableaux créant ainsi des narrations non-linéaires mises en relation avec des mises en espace tridimensionnelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".