Masonic booklets collection, 1899-1922, n.d.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contains 14 booklets of Freemasonry. Titles include Yamasaka Lodge By-laws (Granby, Quebec, 1922); The Mystic Tie: a ceremony for use in Chapters of the Eastern Star by Addie C.S. Engle, 1899; Lecture—Knight Templar Consecration (compiled by Osborne Sheppard from Lectures on Templarism by Col. James Bury MacLeod Moore; Chapter of Rose Croix 15° to 18° ;The Lodge of Perfection 4° to 14°; Lectures on Symbolism (compiled by W. Bro. E.W. Jarvis of the Grand Lodge of N.B.); The Order of the Temple in Canada by Will H. Whyte and W.H.A. Eckhardt; Origin of Degrees (compiled by Osborne Sheppard, from Origin of the English Rite of Freemasonry by W.J. Hughan and History of Freemasonry by R.F. Gould); Capitular Degrees (compiled and published by Osborne Sheppard); Symbolism: Craft Degrees (compiled by Osborne Sheppard); Lectures on Symbolism by Albert Pike; Symbolism: Entered Apprentice (compiled by Osborne Sheppard from Lectures on Symbolism by J. Ross Robertson); When the Nobility and Aristocracy of French Canada Favored Free Masonry (1760-1825): a talk given before the Masonic Study Club of Westmount by C.E. Holmes; French Canadian Masons of Yesteryear: an address by Charles E. Holmes given on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of La Loge des Coeurs-Unis no. 45.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.303 | 0.124 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".