MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067175203

Les paysages éphémères // Chantiers sous surveillance

2022· book· en· W7067175203 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueE-Artexte (Artexte) · 2022
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotographyPoetryMateriality (auditing)Public workNegativeSculpture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

" Since 2015, artist Janie Julien-Fort has been making and installing hundreds of small pinhole cameras around construction sites, acting as makeshift surveillance cameras that scrutinize the progress of work over time. She uses the solargraphy technique: with no mechanism or lens, sunlight passes through a tiny needlehole to leave an imprint on photosensitive paper. Each image requires exposure times of several months. At the end of this long cohabitation with the landscape, the images reveal the randomness of movement, blurred zones and accidents of light. The flickering images evoke the fragility of photography and the passage of time, like the subtle traces left by the path of the sun. Published by Sagamie editions, This two-book set offers a poetic and theoretical journey through the artist’s approach, the Quebec landscape and the materiality of the photographic image. It includes the artist’s book Les paysages éphémères, the fruit of an artistic and literary collaboration between Janie Julien-Fort and author Claire Moeder, and the book Chantiers sous surveillance, presenting the artist’s process of micro-interventions in public space, with texts by Christian Roy and Francis O’Shaugnessy. " -- Artist's website

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-Artexte (Artexte)Same topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207