MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7067176598

Leveraging food-based recommendations for women and children in Nairobi slums with animal source foods

2014· other· en· W7067176598 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilEconomic and Social Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilLeverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and HealthLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineGovernment of CanadaConsortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
KeywordsPopulationPovertyWork (physics)Public health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leveraging food-based recommendations for women and children in Nairobi slums with animal source foods Introduction and aim• Adequate nutrition is key for the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.• In Nairobi slums, rapid urbanisation is creating a strain on the food supply.• Low intakes of high quality foods, such as micronutrient-dense animal-source foods (ASFs), likely contribute to observed high rates of stunting and micronutrient deficiencies• Enhancing the accessibility of ASFs is one strategy that may help to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies of urban poor.• The aim of this research was to investigate how the use of local ASFs might enhance dietary adequacy, for Nairobi slum dwellers, to inform nutrition-sensitive food systems interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)→Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→