MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067232714

Laserspectroscopie van actiniden: octupoolvervorming en gasjetkarakterisatie

2021· article· en· W7067232714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLirias (KU Leuven) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectroscopyHyperfine structureIonizationLaserSpectral lineSpectral resolutionFluorescence spectroscopy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elise Verstraelen her PhD thesis reports on a laser spectroscopy study in the actinide region and covers three main topics. Firstly, the results on in-source resonance-ionization spectroscopy of the neutron-rich actinium isotopes 225-229Ac are detailed. These measurements were performed at the TRIUMF ISAC facility in Vancouver and resulted in new data on the changes in mean-square charge radii and the magnetic dipole moments of isotopes 226,228,229Ac, which lie in one of the regions of the nuclear chart with presumed octupole deformation. In these measurements, the attained spectral resolution did not allow to resolve the full hyperfine structure. Secondly, the in-gas-jet laser spectroscopy method, which is one of the techniques that be applied to measure the (trans)actinides with an improved spectral resolution, has been characterized. An in-depth characterization of the flow properties of a Mach-8.5 de Laval nozzle, designed at the Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, is presented. Using the well-established Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF) as well as the recently presented and validated Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy (PLIFS) technique, relative-density profiles and hyperfine spectra of copper were measured to validate the achievable spectral resolution prior to the utilization in i.a. on-line in-gas-jet resonance ionization spectroscopy of nobelium at the SHIP set-up at GSI. Finally, the initial commissioning of a new laser laboratory (IGLIS II) is presented with the aim to identify and characterize new, efficient laser ionization schemes with particular sensitivities to determine the nuclear observables, that can be compared with atomic theory calculations and used during i.a. on-line in-gas-jet laser-spectroscopy experiments at the S3 Low Energy Branch (LEB) facility at GANIL, France.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLirias (KU Leuven)Same topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207