MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067290978

Mars Inc. buys pet health care company

2017· other· en· W7067290978 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramHealth carePet foodPatient careManaged careMedical equipment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mars is buying the pet health care company VCA in a deal valued at around $7.7 billion. Candy-maker Mars is expanding it presence in the pet industry with the purchase of pet health care company VCA.The deal is reportedly worth 7.7 billion dollars with Mars paying 93 dollars a share while taking on 1.4 billion dollars in debt.VCA has nearly 800 animal hospitals and 60 diagnostic laboratories in the U.S. and Canada.Mars, the maker of sweet treats Snickers, M&MâS, and Wrigley's Doublemint gum......is also a big player in the pet industry as the owner of Banfield Pet Hospital and several pet food brands...The company says VCA will remain a separate business unit...the deal is expected to close in the third quarter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0170.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2270.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicLegal Cases and CommentaryFrench-language works237,207