MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067312795

Mine drainage from Lynx 8 & 10 levels and its implications to reclamation & closure plans at Myra Falls Operations

2009· article· en· W7067312795 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRoyal Roads University
KeywordsNucleofectionExclosureLimitingTubulopathySodium dodecylbenzenesulfonateWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper summarizes mine drainage research conducted from 1997 to 1999 at the Lynx underground mine. The poly-metallic mine is part of Boliden-Westmin's Myra Falls Operations (MFO), located in Strathcona Provincial Park. The Lynx mine is situated on the lower slope of Phillips Ridge, receiving greater than two metres of precipitation annually. The mine's ore body is geologically hosted within a volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposit: and resultant acid rock drainage (ARD) is known to discharge from mine workings. The primary goal of the research program was to improve the understanding of the mine drainage from Lynx's 8 and 10 levels in order to help evaluate the longterm implications for mine closure. The quantity and quality of mine discharge waters and their relationships to\nprecipitation formed the technical basis of the study. The research findings indicate that seasonally acidic conditions occur in certain mine workings during the late summer and early fall months. The Lynx mine's\nhydrologie response to precipitation events is generally rapid, causing ARD products to be flushed-out during infiltration from freshet rains occurring in the fall. Data analysis and re-interpretations of previous research efforts indicate that the existing conceptual Closure Plan options for decommissioning the Lynx mine would not likely be sufficient to effectively seal the portals and mitigate mine drainage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207